Dynamic Earth Simulation Laboratory

University of Alabama

Department of Geological Sciences

Publications

First-Author Publications

Figure from frame_2025_ml_nextgen

PDF LINK
ML for Nextgen (2025)

Jonathan M. Frame, Ryoko Araki, Soelem Aafnan Bhuiyan, Tadd Bindas, Jeremy Rapp, Lauren Bolotin, Emily Deardorff, Qiyue Liu, Francisco Haces-Garcia, Mochi Liao, Nels Frazier, Fred L. Ogden

This paper explores potential machine learning methods most suitable for the Next Generation Water Resources Modeling Framework.

Figure from frame_2024_fim

PDF LINK
Flood Inundation Mapping (2024)

Jonathan M. Frame, Tanya Nair, Veda Sunkara, Philip Popien, Subit Chakrabarti, Tyler Anderson, Nicholas R. Leach, Colin Doyle, Mitchell Thomas, Beth Tellman

This paper proposes a method of generating flood inundation maps based on large-domain hydrologic simulations. Demonstrating predictive performance during the most damaging flood season in California history. Highlighting the need to go beyond simple streamflow-based flood predictions which fail to capture pluvial flooding.

Figure from frame_2023_mass_balance

PDF LINK
Mass Balance Modeling (2023)

Jonathan M. Frame, Frederik Kratzert, Hoshin V. Gupta, Paul Ullrich, Grey S. Nearing

This paper explores the watershed boundary as a control volume of mass conservation, and the potential for machine learning with mass balance constraints to learn volumetric biases in data.

Figure from frame_2022_extreme

PDF LINK
Extreme Event Modeling (2022)

Jonathan M. Frame, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Guy Shalev, Oren Gilon, Logan M. Qualls, Hoshin V. Gupta, and Grey S. Nearing

This paper explores the ability of machine learning models to make predictions of extremely large, and rare, runoff events, particularly when those events are not included in training data.

Figure from frame_2021_post_processing

PDF LINK
Post-Processing NWM (2021)

Jonathan M. Frame, Frederik Kratzert, Austin Raney II, Mashrekur Rahman, Fernando R. Salas, Grey S. Nearing

This paper explores a trivial method of combining hydrologic process-based modeling with machine learning. This approach for hybrid modeling is useful for understanding hydrology across large domains, and for identifying weaknesses in hydrological modeling approaches.

Co-authored Publications

Figure from Abramowitz

Abramowitz et al., 2024, LSTM as a benchmark for land surface energy fluxes

We developed an LSTM model as the benchmark for evaluating land surface models’ predictions of turbulent carbon, water, and heat fluxes using flux tower data from 170 sites.

Figure from RamírezMolina

Ramírez Molina et al., 2024, Synthetic experiment for spatially paired sites for data assimilation.

We contributed a software environment (Deep Bucket Lab) for prototyping deep learning modeling techniques with hydrologically realistic synthetic data.

Figure from nair_2022_deephydro

Nair et al., 2022, DeepHydro

[Description coming soon]